ISO/DIS 37014 · stage 40.60 Close of voting Ballot closed 10 June 2026 Planning date 15 Sep 2027, our estimate Official record
37014ISO 37014 Revision CheckerGroup governance maturity, before publication

All 35 requirements · Governance maturity measurement framework

Model requirement 5.4.3

Governance effectiveness scale

What ISO 37004:2023 asks at 5.4.3, in our own words, and how it reads inside a controlled group. The draft's public contents heading for it is 5.4 Measurement scale.

01The requirement

What the model asks

Effectiveness concerns the practices the governing body uses to apply a principle; ISO 37000's key aspects of practice are the point of departure for every governing body. Table 4: level 0, no practices, or practices not associated with the principle; level 1, practices used but few and incomplete; level 2, practices complete but used inconsistently or not consistently communicated; level 3, complete, consistent and communicated but not assessed for fulfilling the principle's objective; level 4, assessed for fulfilling the objective and the assessment reported; level 5, assessed, reported and continually improved on the basis of the assessments.

02In a controlled group

What it means when one board controls another

Effectiveness ratings should name the level at which the practice operates. For a group-wide practice, rate it for the group purpose and, separately, for each controlled entity whose objective differs. A single rating for a practice that serves two purposes hides the case the draft is about.

03What to record

Evidence an evaluator asks for

A maturity rating is a claim about how the group governs. The evidence is what proves it operated. Keep both, and keep them together.

  • Effectiveness scale: Effectiveness ratings per principle with the practices and assessments evidenced
04Gaps

Where evaluations commonly find gaps

  • Practices rated effective without any assessment against the principle's objective
05How it is rated

How this requirement enters the rating

This unit governs the instrument. The scale must be fixed before the ratings, the level labels must be the published ones, and the aspect-specific descriptions must be used for the aspect being rated. The six levels are on /scale/.

It carries 1 evidence item and 1 common gap in the model. One item is enough only if it is the artefact that proves the practice operated, not a policy that says it should. The group application on this page is ours; the requirement and evidence are the model's, stated in our own words.

06Read next
07Source

Source for this page

Retrieved 2026-10-21. The requirement above is our statement of the clause in our own words; the official text is linked so you can check it.

Note on the draft: The requirement, evidence and gaps on this page are read from ISO 37004:2023, which the draft states it builds on. The draft's own clause body is not public, so this page does not state it. The clause reference at the top is the draft's public contents heading that this requirement sits under.

The maturity kit, USD 299 one off. The 35-requirement register, the 54-cell maturity worksheet, the evidence list and a dated plan, as PDF, CSV and XLSX.

See the kit Open the free specimen