ISO/DIS 37014 · stage 40.60 Close of voting Ballot closed 10 June 2026 Planning date 15 Sep 2027, our estimate Official record
37014ISO 37014 Revision CheckerGroup governance maturity, before publication

All 35 requirements · Governance maturity measurement framework

Model requirement 5.3.1

Commitment

What ISO 37004:2023 asks at 5.3.1, in our own words, and how it reads inside a controlled group. The draft's public contents heading for it is 5.3 Measurement activities.

01The requirement

What the model asks

To show it is accountable to the organization, the governing body should demonstrate its commitment to measuring governance maturity by: making sure evaluations take place at regular intervals; delegating the authority and responsibility needed; making sure the evaluation's intent, scope and objectives are set and the level of evidence required is made clear; making sure resources are provided; making sure the results become the foundation for improvement initiatives; and overseeing how the results, and the improvement initiatives, are reported.

02In a controlled group

What it means when one board controls another

The commitment has to be visible to both boards. A resolution of the controller's board that does not reach the controlled entity boards leaves each entity to decide whether to cooperate. Record the resolution, the delegation and the resources, and send it to every governing body in the boundary.

03What to record

Evidence an evaluator asks for

A maturity rating is a claim about how the group governs. The evidence is what proves it operated. Keep both, and keep them together.

  • Commitment: Governing body resolution establishing regular evaluations with scope, objectives, delegation and resources
04Gaps

Where evaluations commonly find gaps

  • Evaluation initiated by management with no governing body commitment
05How it is rated

How this requirement enters the rating

This unit is one of the five measurement activities. Treat it as a programme step with its own artefact and its own owner, and record the artefact in the evaluation file. The activity page carries what to keep.

It carries 1 evidence item and 1 common gap in the model. One item is enough only if it is the artefact that proves the practice operated, not a policy that says it should. The group application on this page is ours; the requirement and evidence are the model's, stated in our own words.

06Read next
07Source

Source for this page

Retrieved 2026-10-21. The requirement above is our statement of the clause in our own words; the official text is linked so you can check it.

Note on the draft: The requirement, evidence and gaps on this page are read from ISO 37004:2023, which the draft states it builds on. The draft's own clause body is not public, so this page does not state it. The clause reference at the top is the draft's public contents heading that this requirement sits under.

The maturity kit, USD 299 one off. The 35-requirement register, the 54-cell maturity worksheet, the evidence list and a dated plan, as PDF, CSV and XLSX.

See the kit Open the free specimen