ISO/DIS 37014 · stage 40.60 Close of voting Ballot closed 10 June 2026 Planning date 15 Sep 2027, our estimate Official record
37014ISO 37014 Revision CheckerGroup governance maturity, before publication

All 35 requirements · Governance maturity aspects

Model requirement 4.4.6

Governance charters

What ISO 37004:2023 asks at 4.4.6, in our own words, and how it reads inside a controlled group. The draft's public contents heading for it is 4.4 Governance efficiency.

01The requirement

What the model asks

A governance charter puts a delegation into formal terms and provides the basis for judging, and improving, how well the delegation is carried out. Charters should set out in detail the delegations that the relevant governance policies point to, and should give an accurate picture of the organizational governance framework and strategy, as well as of any secondary frameworks and strategies.

02In a controlled group

What it means when one board controls another

A charter is the clearest evidence of a delegation. For each controlled entity, record whether its charter or equivalent states the reserved matters and the limits, and whether it has been reviewed since the group structure last changed.

03What to record

Evidence an evaluator asks for

A maturity rating is a claim about how the group governs. The evidence is what proves it operated. Keep both, and keep them together.

  • Governance charters: Charters (terms of reference, role contracts) for every delegated structure, aligned to policy and framework
04Gaps

Where evaluations commonly find gaps

  • Committees operating without terms of reference
  • Charters out of step with the framework
05How it is rated

How this requirement enters the rating

This unit supplies the evidence for the efficiency aspect. Rate it on the six-point scale, cite the record that shows it operated in the period, and read the aspect page before you assign a level. The level descriptions for this aspect are on /aspects/efficiency/.

It carries 1 evidence item and 2 common gaps in the model. One item is enough only if it is the artefact that proves the practice operated, not a policy that says it should. Both gaps are seen often enough in first evaluations that the evaluation design should test for them explicitly. The group application on this page is ours; the requirement and evidence are the model's, stated in our own words.

06Read next
07Source

Source for this page

Retrieved 2026-10-21. The requirement above is our statement of the clause in our own words; the official text is linked so you can check it.

Note on the draft: The requirement, evidence and gaps on this page are read from ISO 37004:2023, which the draft states it builds on. The draft's own clause body is not public, so this page does not state it. The clause reference at the top is the draft's public contents heading that this requirement sits under.

The maturity kit, USD 299 one off. The 35-requirement register, the 54-cell maturity worksheet, the evidence list and a dated plan, as PDF, CSV and XLSX.

See the kit Open the free specimen