ISO/DIS 37014 · stage 40.60 Close of voting Ballot closed 10 June 2026 Planning date 15 Sep 2027, our estimate Official record
37014ISO 37014 Revision CheckerGroup governance maturity, before publication

All 35 requirements · Governance maturity model

Model requirement 6.2.1

Governance conditions

What ISO 37004:2023 asks at 6.2.1, in our own words, and how it reads inside a controlled group. The draft's public contents heading for it is 6.2 Governance maturity dimensions.

01The requirement

What the model asks

The governance conditions set out in clause 4 of ISO 37000 form dimensions for evaluation: an integrated organizational governance framework that coordinates governance activity throughout the organization; delegation that is effective and builds trust and transparency; management, so that anyone who holds both governance and management duties can tell them apart and act properly in each role; sustainability treated as a basic consideration when governing and when applying the principles; fair treatment of every stakeholder, with regard for what relevant stakeholders expect; a governing body whose make-up and structure equip it for its role; and a governing body that keeps building its competence in the organization's activities, its legal obligations and its context.

02In a controlled group

What it means when one board controls another

The seven conditions are the group test. Integrated framework, effective delegation, the governance and management distinction, sustainability, fair treatment of stakeholders, board composition and board competence all take a different meaning when a controller sits above the entity board. Rate each condition against the entity's own purpose as well as the group's.

03What to record

Evidence an evaluator asks for

A maturity rating is a claim about how the group governs. The evidence is what proves it operated. Keep both, and keep them together.

  • Governance conditions: Evaluation covering each of the seven conditions against the three aspects
04Gaps

Where evaluations commonly find gaps

  • Conditions such as delegation or competence left out of scope
05How it is rated

How this requirement enters the rating

This unit defines the dimensions. List every condition and every principle before rating, and rate each at the level where it operates. The full dimension list is on /dimensions/.

It carries 1 evidence item and 1 common gap in the model. One item is enough only if it is the artefact that proves the practice operated, not a policy that says it should. The group application on this page is ours; the requirement and evidence are the model's, stated in our own words.

06Read next
07Source

Source for this page

Retrieved 2026-10-21. The requirement above is our statement of the clause in our own words; the official text is linked so you can check it.

Note on the draft: The requirement, evidence and gaps on this page are read from ISO 37004:2023, which the draft states it builds on. The draft's own clause body is not public, so this page does not state it. The clause reference at the top is the draft's public contents heading that this requirement sits under.

The maturity kit, USD 299 one off. The 35-requirement register, the 54-cell maturity worksheet, the evidence list and a dated plan, as PDF, CSV and XLSX.

See the kit Open the free specimen