ISO/DIS 37014 · stage 40.60 Close of voting Ballot closed 10 June 2026 Planning date 15 Sep 2027, our estimate Official record
37014ISO 37014 Revision CheckerGroup governance maturity, before publication

All 35 requirements · Governance maturity measurement framework

Model requirement 5.1

The measurement framework and its five activities

What ISO 37004:2023 asks at 5.1, in our own words, and how it reads inside a controlled group. The draft's public contents heading for it is 5.1 General.

01The requirement

What the model asks

The measurement framework evaluates the maturity with which the ISO 37000 governance principles have been applied, with regard to the key aspects of practice, using the maturity aspects of clause 4; it gives a structured approach for clarity of purpose, consistency of results and repeatability. Measurement comprises five activities: commit (establish the governing body's commitment), design (determine and plan scope, time frames and objectives), implement (conduct the evaluation), oversee (monitor progress and act where necessary) and action (review results, plan improvements and report).

02In a controlled group

What it means when one board controls another

The five activities are the programme, and in a group the commit step must come from the controller's governing body if the entity boards are to take the exercise seriously. A programme commissioned by a group function and imposed on the entities tends to produce compliance, not evidence.

03What to record

Evidence an evaluator asks for

A maturity rating is a claim about how the group governs. The evidence is what proves it operated. Keep both, and keep them together.

  • Measurement framework: Evaluation programme structured on the five activities
04Gaps

Where evaluations commonly find gaps

  • Evaluations run ad hoc without commitment, design or follow-up
05How it is rated

How this requirement enters the rating

This unit sets the quality of the whole measurement. Record how the requirement was met before the ratings are taken; an evaluation that meets it afterwards is a rationalisation.

It carries 1 evidence item and 1 common gap in the model. One item is enough only if it is the artefact that proves the practice operated, not a policy that says it should. The group application on this page is ours; the requirement and evidence are the model's, stated in our own words.

06Read next
07Source

Source for this page

Retrieved 2026-10-21. The requirement above is our statement of the clause in our own words; the official text is linked so you can check it.

Note on the draft: The requirement, evidence and gaps on this page are read from ISO 37004:2023, which the draft states it builds on. The draft's own clause body is not public, so this page does not state it. The clause reference at the top is the draft's public contents heading that this requirement sits under.

The maturity kit, USD 299 one off. The 35-requirement register, the 54-cell maturity worksheet, the evidence list and a dated plan, as PDF, CSV and XLSX.

See the kit Open the free specimen